What are the differences in yield formation among two cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) cultivars and their F-1 hybrid? | |
Wang Xiu-juan1,2![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Source Publication | JOURNAL OF INTEGRATIVE AGRICULTURE
![]() |
ISSN | 2095-3119 |
2020-07-01 | |
Volume | 19Issue:7Pages:1789-1801 |
Corresponding Author | Kang Meng-zhen(mengzhen.kang@ia.ac.cn) |
Abstract | To elucidate the mechanisms underlying the differences in yield formation among two parents (P-1 and P-2) and their F-1 hybrid of cucumber, biomass production and whole source-sink dynamics were analyzed using a functional-structural plant model (FSPM) that simulates both the number and size of individual organs. Observations of plant development and organ biomass were recorded throughout the growth periods of the plants. The GreenLab Model was used to analyze the differences in fruit setting, organ expansion, biomass production and biomass allocation. The source-sink parameters were estimated from the experimental measurements. Moreover, a particle swarm optimization algorithm (PSO) was applied to analyze whether the fruit setting is related to the source-sink ratio. The results showed that the internal source-sink ratio increased in the vegetative stage and reached a peak until the first fruit setting. The high yield of hybrid F-1 is the compound result of both fruit setting and the internal source-sink ratio. The optimization results also revealed that the incremental changes in fruit weight result from the increases in sink strength and proportion of plant biomass allocation for fruits. The model-aided analysis revealed that heterosis is a result of a delicate compromise between fruit setting and fruit sink strength. The organ-level model may provide a computational approach to define the target of breeding by combination with a genetic model. |
Keyword | cucumber biomass production functional-structural plant model source-sink ratio fruit-setting PSO heterosis |
DOI | 10.1016/S2095-3119(20)63218-X |
WOS Keyword | FUNCTIONAL-STRUCTURAL MODEL ; PLANT-GROWTH ; FRUIT-SET ; TOMATO ; SIMULATION ; DYNAMICS ; PATTERNS |
Indexed By | SCI |
Language | 英语 |
Funding Project | National Natural Science Foundation of China[31700315] ; National Natural Science Foundation of China[61533019] ; Natural Science Foundation of Chongqing, China[cstc2018jcyjAX0587] ; Chinese Academy of Science (CAS)-Thailand National Science and Technology Development Agency (NSTDA) Joint Research Program[GJHZ2076] |
Funding Organization | National Natural Science Foundation of China ; Natural Science Foundation of Chongqing, China ; Chinese Academy of Science (CAS)-Thailand National Science and Technology Development Agency (NSTDA) Joint Research Program |
WOS Research Area | Agriculture |
WOS Subject | Agriculture, Multidisciplinary |
WOS ID | WOS:000538956900011 |
Publisher | ELSEVIER SCI LTD |
Sub direction classification | 人工智能+农业 |
Citation statistics | |
Document Type | 期刊论文 |
Identifier | http://ir.ia.ac.cn/handle/173211/39797 |
Collection | 复杂系统管理与控制国家重点实验室_平行智能技术与系统团队 |
Corresponding Author | Kang Meng-zhen |
Affiliation | 1.Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Automat, State Key Lab Management & Control Complex Syst, Beijing 100190, Peoples R China 2.Chinese Acad Sci, Beijing Engn Res Ctr Intelligent Syst & Technol, Inst Automat, Beijing 100190, Peoples R China 3.Qingdao Acad Intelligent Ind, Innovat Ctr Parallel Agr, Qingdao 266109, Peoples R China 4.Chongqing Technol & Business Univ, Sch Comp Sci & Informat Engn, Chongqing 400067, Peoples R China 5.China Agr Univ, Coll Informat & Elect Engn, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China 6.China Agr Univ, Coll Land Sci & Technol, Beijing 100193, Peoples R China 7.Chinese Acad Agr Sci, Agr Genomes Inst Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518124, Peoples R China 8.Univ Montpellier, AMAP, CIRAD, CNRS,INRA,IRD, F-34000 Montpellier, France 9.Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Sch Comp & Control Engn, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China |
First Author Affilication | Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences |
Corresponding Author Affilication | Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences |
Recommended Citation GB/T 7714 | Wang Xiu-juan,Kang Meng-zhen,Fan Xing-rong,et al. What are the differences in yield formation among two cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) cultivars and their F-1 hybrid?[J]. JOURNAL OF INTEGRATIVE AGRICULTURE,2020,19(7):1789-1801. |
APA | Wang Xiu-juan.,Kang Meng-zhen.,Fan Xing-rong.,Yang Li-le.,Zhang Bao-gui.,...&Wang Fei-yue.(2020).What are the differences in yield formation among two cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) cultivars and their F-1 hybrid?.JOURNAL OF INTEGRATIVE AGRICULTURE,19(7),1789-1801. |
MLA | Wang Xiu-juan,et al."What are the differences in yield formation among two cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) cultivars and their F-1 hybrid?".JOURNAL OF INTEGRATIVE AGRICULTURE 19.7(2020):1789-1801. |
Files in This Item: | There are no files associated with this item. |
Items in the repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
Edit Comment